“This signals a new dawn for weight loss products.”

Industry backs EFSA report on low-calorie diet regimes

SNE: “We urge European decision makers to now translate this updated scientific evidence into legislation..."

EFSA’s full low-calorie diet regime report – published this week – can help “tackle the societal challenge of obesity”, the EU’s specialist food trade group has said.

“This signals a new dawn for weight loss products,” said Roger Clarke, the president of pan-European group, Specialised Nutrition Europe (SNE). With EFSA backing, such regimes could gain a new legitimacy.

However Clarke told us there “ is a lot of water to go under the bridge” before, and in what form, the findings of the report influence the writing of EU regulations such as Foods for Specific Groups (FSG) and the nutrition and health claims regulation (NHCR).

Total low calorie diets (LCD – 800-1200 calories per day) and very low calorie diets (VLCD – 400-800 calories per day) are very niche and usually prescribed to patients by healthcare professionals suffering from clinical obesity or other medical conditions.

EFSA said…

Rising obesity levels have thrown a more mainstream light on their use – hence EFSA’s report which was requested by the European Commission to help inform its deliberations on how best to regulate the products across the 28-member EU bloc.

EFSA’s scientific assessment concluded a low­ calorie diet replacement regime should contain a minimum of 600 calories, 75 g of protein and 30 g of carbohydrates per day. It said the diets were only suitable for overweight or obese people without other medical conditions and there was no data to back their safety after three months.

The NDA said the 600 calorie per day figure was determined “from the minimum content of macronutrients” in the foods which should “provide at least the Population Reference Intake (PRI) or the Adequate Intake (AI) for adults of all indispensable nutrients.”

One dietician called the report “disgusting” as it would promote crash diets that are not proven effective in the battle against the bulge, but Clarke noted the medical route that most commonly led to their use and added his group advocated responsible use of products like meal replacement shakes and bars.

Labelling agenda

If EFSA’s recommendations are implemented in law, it could mean products like bars and shakes and other items in ranges like Unilever’s Slimfast, will have to carry information about their use in low-calorie diet regimes.

This is set to occur in 2016 but logistical issues may arise due to large amounts of information being required on often very small packages like that of a bar.

“Perhaps some of the required information will flow onto websites,” Clarke speculated.

There are two approved weight-related health claims for meal replacements and these may also influence how the products are classified under the FSG.

“We urge European decision makers to now translate this updated scientific evidence into legislation in an appropriate way which will meet the current needs and expectations of both consumers and healthcare practitioners,” Clarke said.

SNE expressed opposition to the separation of LCD and VLCD in the law. “While total daily replacement products (VLCD & LCD) will be clearly regulated under the new FSG Regulation, meal replacements and part of meal replacements will fall under general food law once the new FSG rules will become applicable in 2016.”

“In light of this new opinion from EFSA, SNE calls for legislative consistency for all categories of slimming foods, in order to ensure consistency for consumers who depend on these products as a safe and efficient way to lose and maintain weight after weight loss.”

Related News

A potential dietary solution to type 2 diabetes could save the NHS €97.93m a year, according to the researcher behind an ongoing five-year study

Could the future of type-2 diabetes treatment be prescription diets?

'Given that we understood it was extremely difficult for nutrition experts to devise such a diet, we considered it would be highly unlikely that an average consumer would readily be able to do so,' ASA says

ASA rejects LighterLife Fast complaint: It's hard to get 100% of RDAs with 600 kcal of ‘ordinary' food

Glycaemic carbs win EFSA cognitive function approval; lycopene ingredient rejected

Glycaemic carbs win EFSA cognitive function approval; lycopene ingredient rejected

EFSA says 550 mg of choline, SNE says that would make products taste of fish

Meal replacement regulation should consider consumers not just science: SNE

CAP allows certain ‘responsible lifestyle weight loss programmes’ to explicitly reference obesity for the first time

UK opens door to adverts targeting obese in wake of public health crisis

Tomorrow (21 May) marks to the sixth European Obesity Day. © iStock.com / VladimirFLoyd

Meal replacements have key role to play in obesity battle – and need support from EU policy makers

The European Commission has asked EFSA for help on how best to regulate such low-calorie diets across the EU. ©iStock/hannahgleg

EU low-cal diet industry "could fold" if rules rubber stamped, warns trade body

EFSA: Products should be "safe and suitable when consumed as a sole source of nutrition for several weeks to months by overweight or obese adults"

600 calories, 75 g protein, 30 g carbs: EFSA issues ‘milestone’ diet replacement opinion

Novel beverages boast added nutrients - but do we actually need them?

Super vit crit! Researchers challenge drinks with 'extraordinarily high' added micronutrients

Has EFSA mingled safety and efficacy assessment in its rejection of a health claim for conjugated linoleic acid (CLA) and body fat mass reduction?

CLA health claim rejection ‘another bad day’ for fat-reduction products

EFSA says studies lacked product type specificity in rejecting yoghurt wight loss claims

EFSA rejects yoghurt weight loss health claims

Related Products

See more related products

Submit a comment

Your comment has been saved

Post a comment

Please note that any information that you supply is protected by our Privacy and Cookie Policy. Access to all documents and request for further information are available to all users at no costs, In order to provide you with this free service, William Reed Business Media SAS does share your information with companies that have content on this site. When you access a document or request further information from this site, your information maybe shared with the owners of that document or information.