From the 2014 International PlantLIBRA Conference in Vienna, Austria

EC gives thumbs up to €6m PlantLIBRA botanicals project. But will there be more?

Loading the player...

As the EU’s ambitious €6m PlantLIBRA project to further botancials science drew to a close this week at a congress in Vienna, we asked the European Commission about the project’s relative merits – and whether a ‘mark 2’ was on the cards.

The 4-year project was multifarious and included work by scientists who also worked on the independent 1000-strong BELFRIT list that is widely regarded as one of the most comprehensive lists of botanical safety and efficacy ever produced in Europe. But that project was not PlantLIBRA funded.

“I have to say based on everything I have seen, it has been very successful,” Dieter Brigitta, research programme officer at the Directorate-General for Research and Innovation in the EC, told us in Vienna of PlantLIBRA.

“It actually validated why the European Commission put forward this topic four years ago…a lot of the research questions that were put forward at the start were answered but also a lot of very new, interesting research ideas have come forward and that’s often a good indicator of a good project when the questions that were asked at the beginning prove to be valid questions but also very new, intriguing ways of moving forward.”

Brigitta said the project had potential to influence EU botanicals policy making and that there was scope for more EU-backed research in the area, if not in exactly the same form.

Related News

“Some plants were excluded because it was felt that the industry was not really using them. Evidence to the contrary would be important,” says Italian consultant.

And the losers were… BELFRIT’s missing botanicals compiled

FSE: "This marks indeed an important step toward a comprehensive regulatory framework for botanicals..."

France adopts 60% of BELFRIT list for safe botanicals

“In the new European Commission, form follows function. We have to be open to change. We have to show that the Commission can change," says Commission president.

Juncker’s Commission announced: Lithuanian takes health and food safety spot

"The problem concerns the fact that a simplified registration for traditional health claims was omitted in the NHCR."

Author response: On the bending of EU botanical laws and meanings

EU harmonisation needed to break botanical deadlock

What will it take to break the botanicals deadlock?

The problem with botanicals is just a matter of colliding cultures, industry interests and of process, says managing director for Italian-based Hylobates Consulting

It's time to end EU’s botanical Babel, says expert

PlantLIBRA on fennel supplement consumption

Fennel supplements – why do Europeans take them and are they safe?

'Insufficient evidence to establish a cause and effect relationship,' the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) concludes. Photo credit: / Heike Rau

EFSA rejects Echinacea extract and anxiety claim

Luca Bucchini, PhD: “For companies, the Italian list likely to be seen as reference for speedy mutual recognition assessment."

BELFRIT leads Europe in botanicals harmonisation as Italy affirms 1000-strong list

“Reiterative applications of the assessment scheme to related botanicals or different botanical preparations obtained from the same plant variety can allow a QPS status to be derived for specific groupings...”

EFSA backs broad brush botanical safety assessment

The 6-nation survey found 2359 people used 1288 different products and 491 individual botanicals and extracts.

Ginkgo, evening primrose top massive EU-funded botanicals survey; 1-in-5 imbibe

Belgium, France and Italy unite on positive botanicals list

Belgium, France and Italy unite on positive botanicals list

€6m EU herb food science project boosts tradition-of-use data

€6m EU herb food science project boosts tradition-of-use data

Related Products

See more related products